To put it mildly, I despise people who wound ban books because something about a particular book disagrees with their worldview. It is the most cowardly, chickenshitted thing someone could do, in my humble opinion. One suspects that I'm not the only person who feels this way. But am I? In this particular case one would think that there would be a few courageous souls in the Alabama legislature who would show up to decry this action, just on the principle of the thing, even if their worldview agreed with that of the would-be banner.Technorati Tag: politics; first amendment
Apparently not.Editor's Note: When the time for the vote in the legislature came there were not enough state legislators present for the vote, so the measure died automatically.
{emphasis mine}
They didn't have a quorum. That's why this bill died. Not because anyone had the guts to stand up and decry book banning, but rather because this was the solution that, I suspect, would ruffle the least amount of feathers.
Chickenshits.
Friday
On Book Banning: Chickenshits, Says Kathy
Kathy at Cake Eater Chronicles has much to say about book banning:
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment